You know, I believe in the right to keep and bears arms just as the Supreme Court ruled the Second Amendment says. I believe the Judeo-Christian Faith is what allowed America to grow into the nation it is today. I believe people should have the right to educate their own children when public schools fail due to teachers indoctrinating rather than educating students.
And Mark Warner has the unmitigated gall to call me a "threat to America?"
Does he not see his own presidential candidate, the one he has pictures of in his own ads, palling around with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and not see that as a threat? Does he not see Obama's thugs trying to silence criticism through the use prosecutors and law-enforcement officials and not see that as a threat?
No, he sees people like me, people who believe in the rights guaranteed under the first ten amendments, as a threat to America.
He might as well have just called me and millions like me a "macaca."
You can access the audio of him saying these things here:
Or you can access it on-line here:
Warner Attacks The NRA And Other Groups
YouTube.com
July 22, 2008
Monday, October 6, 2008
Mark Warner's Macaca Moment: Calls Christians, NRA Members And Home-Schoolers A 'Threat To America'
Posted by
84rules
at
5:59 PM
0
comments
Labels: christian, Commonwealth of Virginia, Home School, judeo-christian, macaca, Mark Warner, NRA, Second Amendment
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Homeschooling Case Exposes Liberal Left
Leftists are becoming bolder about what they really stand for. That is actually an amazing fact since left-wing policies were shown to be such dismal failures, especially in Eastern Europe and most third-world countries.
This time, the left has come out and stated in unambiguous terms their goal with our children through public education. It came out in a case in California where an appellate court ruled that parents have no right to homeschool.
According to John Stossel at TownHall.com:
| The cat is finally out of the bag. A California appellate court, ruling that parents have no constitutional right to homeschool their children, pinned its decision on this ominous quotation from a 47-year-old case, "A primary purpose of the educational system is to train schoolchildren in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation as a means of protecting the public welfare." There you have it; a primary purpose of government schools is to train schoolchildren "in loyalty to the state." Somehow that protects "the public welfare" more than allowing parents to homeschool their children, even though homeschooled kids routinely outperform government-schooled kids academically. In 2006, homeschooled students had an average ACT composite score of 22.4. The national average was 21.1. |
Yes, I too noticed the phrases "primary purpose of the educational system" and "lotalty to the state." It immediately reminded me of what Albert J. Nock wrote in his classic essay, Our Enemy, The State. But that will be a topic for another post.
What should be scaring the living bejeezus out of you right now is that little phrase "loyalty to the state." It means that our public education system is no longer committed to educating our children, rather that it is now in place to indoctrinate them the same way Soviet-style Communist regimes indoctrinated their children. It is there to teach kids to become dependent on the paternalistic government rather than be self-reliant and self-determinating.
But dependency on the State worked so well in the old Soviet bloc, didn't it? Leftists and libs are completely ignorant of history. And they seem to want to make everyone else ignorant of it too. Hence, the ruling by the California appellate court.
Stossel also notes something else:
| The court finds no constitutional right to homeschool one's children. But in a free country, people are free to do anything not expressly prohibited by law. |
Yep. If libs think that parents shouldn't be allowed to homeschool because that right is not specifically listed in the Constitution, then all libs should be required to change their beliefs from pro-abortion to pro-life since the right to an abortion also does not appear anywhere in the Constitution.
But then, hypocrisy is a garment the left has always worn with pride.
You can access the complete article on-line here:
Threat To Homeschooling
John Stossel
TownHall.com
April 2, 2008
Posted by
84rules
at
8:41 AM
0
comments
Labels: abortion, Appellate Court, California, communist, Home School, John Stossel