I know. Several of you libs out there will say that I am over-reacting to some harmless twit who happens to write for Playboy Magazine. Well, my answer to that is: Would you leftists have the same exact attitude if it were a Conservative man writing about wanting to hate**** leftist-liberal women? I doubt that anyone on the left would tolerate that for even two seconds.
Thus, leftist the double standard shines through once again.
In case you don't know what I am writing about, Playboy published an article by some idiot named Guy Cimbalo who lists the Top 10 Republican women he would like to hate****/rape.
Here is what was written in that article:
|Obama promised us the dream of post-partisanship-a cuckoo land where party affiliation and factional animosity were forgotten. Turn on cable news or open any newspaper, however, and you’ll quickly discover that the dream has yet to materialize. But there is a way to reach across the aisle without letting principles fall by the wayside. We speak, naturally, of the hate f***. We may despise everything these women represent, but goddammit they’re hot. Let the healing begin.|
Although Cimbalo wrote this himself, his use of the word "we" suggests that everyone at Playboy feels this hatred of these Republican women and that they believe these women should be treated roughly for their opinions.
Apparently, Playboy was so embarrased by the whole thing that they've already pulled the pages off of their website and tried to throw them into the memory hole. Too late though. You can access screenshots of those pages on-line here:
Screenshots of So Right, It's Wrong
Warning: Language Content!!!
June 2, 2009
And Washington Times writer Amanda Carpenter, who made the Top 10 list, has this to say:
|I’m in Playboy for GOP women they’d like to “hate f***” They didn’t even get my employer right. What should I do? Mon 01 Jun 11:51 via web|
I’m steamed. That list is vile, insulting and WRONG on factual matters.
The use of the word hate **** makes this list vile and completely out of line. To suggest to men that GOP women should have some kind of rough sex pushed on them because of their political beliefs is sickening. They are smearing professional women over politics and not even pretending to look at facts. They didn’t even get my employer right, but there was detailed descriptions of how I might perform in bed.
Looks like Playboy has sunk to the level of Larry Flint. Any claims of class on the part of Playboy must now be considered as chutzpuh.
Again, to all of you libs who would simply excuse this away as some sort of immature "boys will be boys" happening, I have to ask: Would you hold the same exact attitude if it were a Conservative man writing that he wanted to hate**** liberal women?
Feel free to respond.